Background: The Class II Malocclusion is the most frequent dento-skeletal anomaly that involves one third of all orthodontic patients. So many appliances have been described in the literature for treating this malocclusion, in particular when it’s indicated to obtain a mandibular advancement. The aim of this study is to compare the dental and skeletal effects of Frankel II Regulator and Cervera...

Background (1): Removable orthodontic appliances may favor plaque accumulation and oral microbe colonization. This might be associated with intraoral adverse effects on enamel or periodontal tissues. The proposed systematic review was carried out to evaluate qualitatively quantitatively the microbiological changes occurring during therapy removable appliances. Methods (2): PubMed, Cochrane Libr...

labial bows require periodic tightening to maintain their activation. Without these adjustments, the activation loops at each end of the labial bow gradually open, reducing the force delivered by the appliance and often causing a relapse of anterior crowding. Since such relapse occurs gradually, the patient may be unaware of it until it has advanced to the degree that retreatment with fixed app...

BACKGROUND A maxillary midline diastema (MMD) often is a primary concern of patients during a dental consultation. Although an MMD can be transient owing to the developing dentition and, thus, requires no active treatment, management of MMDs in the permanent dentition requires a detailed examination and appropriate care. CASE DESCRIPTION . The authors present five cases of MMDs in adults to ...

Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the skeletal and dento-alveolar effects of the Rick-A-Nator appliance in the treatment of growing patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion due to retrusive mandible. Methods: 13 Class II growing patients with mandibular retrusion and between the ages of 9 years and 12 years were selected to be included in this study. Control group for the tr...

BACKGROUND Treatment effects of removable functional appliances in Class II malocclusion patients according to the pre-pubertal or pubertal growth phase has yet to be clarified. OBJECTIVES To assess and compare skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of removable functional appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment between pre-pubertal and pubertal patients. SEARCH METHODS Literature survey ...