In his book ‘Is a Good God Logically Possible?’, James Sterba argues that the existence of much evil to be found in world is logically incompatible with God. I defend Thomistic view when one properly understands nature and relationship world, this so-called logical problem does not arise. While has responded version position presented by Brian Davies, argue response fails.

A Refutation of Skeptical Theism David Kyle Johnson The evidential problem of evil suggests that our awareness of the existence of seemingly unjustified evils reduces the epistemic probability of God’s existence. Arguments to this effect have been most famously and successfully championed by William Rowe. 1 His defense of the argument has developed over the years, but the basics of the argument...

In this essay, I revisit the univocity thesis, Sterba’s analogy between God and a leader of politically liberal society, and, most fundamentally, whether existence horrendous evils is logically compatible with good God. concede that typical appeals to free will greater goods defenses block logical problem evil are not sufficient because they do adequately address all too much feature human exis...

Sterba argues that God would be ethically bound to implement a set of exceptionless evil prevention requirements. However, he the world as we know it is not if were applying them. concludes does exist. In this paper, I offer penal colony theodicy will show how entirely compatible with God’s implementation such