There are errors in the Funding section. The correct funding information is as follows: This project was funded by the Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China (2015NWB046) and the Program for the Top Young Talents in Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences (1630052015049). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or ...

Information is missing from the Funding section. The correct funding information is as follows: This work was supported by the Qatar Foundation through the Qatar National Research Fund (grant programs NPRP4-640-1-096 and JSREP4-011-1-003) and the Qatar Science Leadership Program. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the ma...

In the Funding section, the funder “Amphibian Research and Monitoring Initiative” is incorrectly referred to as the “Amphibian and Reptile Monitoring Initiative.” The correct funding information is as follows: This work was funded by the 2008 USGS Amphibian Research and Monitoring Initiative competitive grant program. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decisio...

There are errors in the Funding section. The correct funding information is as follows: The present study was funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Medical Research Council Programme (MRC Ref: G1002231 awarded to BJE, JWD, TWR, Wellcome Trust Ref: 093875/Z/ 10/Z), and the R24 Alcohol Research Resource Award grant (R24 AA015512) from NIAAA. The funders had no role in study design, data collection...

In this article, we study the evaluation of talented early career researchers, as done in grant allocation processes. To better understand funding decisions, we studied the grant allocation process in more detail, and compared the notion of talent in grant allocation with more general notions of talent existing in the academic work environment. The comparison is based on interviews with 29 scho...

The RO1 HL113178 grant is missing from the Funding section. The complete, correct Funding section is: This work is supported by grants from the NIH/ NHLBI RO1 HL090829 (V.P.K.), 2RO1 HL071106 (V.P.K.), RO1 HL114085 (V.P.K.),and RO1 HL113178 (E.A.G.), DOD IDEA TS030012 (V.P.K.), the LAM Foundation (V.P.K. and E.A.G.), and the American Thoracic Society (E.A.G.). The funders had no role in study d...

There is an omission in the Funding section. The correct funding information is as follows: This research was supported by the Pudong New District Health Systems Personnel Training Plan (NO. PWR1210–04) and Outstanding Leaders Training Program of Pudong Health Bureau of Shanghai (Grant NO. PWR1210-04). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, o...

A grant number is missing in the Funding section. The correct funding information is as follows: The project is supported by the National Institutes of Health grants 5R01GM080646-09 and HHSN272201000053C (www.nih.gov). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. access article distributed under the terms of the Cre...

Two grant numbers are inadvertently omitted in the Funding section. The correct funding information is as follows: Authors are funded by the following grants from the DFG (http://www.dfg.de/en/) (DFG BO3790/1-1), DFG (FI1781/1-1) and the following grants from the ESRC (http://www.esrc.ac. uk/) (ES/L010690/1) and (ES/M009203/1). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analys...

The following information is missing from the Funding section: PI11/01433—FEDER. The complete, correct funding information is as follows: This work was supported by grants from Instituto de Salud Carlos III-FEDER, (PI11/01433). MP was supported by a FI grant of the Agencia de Gestió d’Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decisi...