The Moral Position of Traditional and Electronic Transactions in the Absence of Intention and Consent

Background: Due to the increasing expansion of the electronic world in all aspects, e-commerce has found its place alongside traditional transactions and in turn are of particular importance and have left a significant share in commercial contracts. This has led to significant ethical challenges. E-commerce, due to the lack of necessary legal and legal grounds, lack of proper mechanism to protect consumer rights, lack of necessary security for exchanges and exchange of information, etc., has provided a potential ground for violating business ethics. Therefore, the present study decided to examine the moral status of traditional and electronic transactions in the absence of intention and consent, which is one of the important ethical principles in concluding contracts. Conclusion: By examining the factors of lack of intention and consent such as error, reluctance and urgency, each of which has different effects on the contract from the point of view of ethics, it became clear that because intention is the constructive element of the contract and consent is the only condition for its validity. It is considered that the contract will be ineffective in the case of intentional ineffectiveness, in the absence of intention, and the contract will be ineffective in the case of reluctance in the case of reluctance, in the absence of consent. However, urgency, which is moral, has no effect on the transaction. In essence, there is no difference between e-commerce and traditional trading; It's just that the two are different. The same applies to e-commerce.