The analysis the view of right to the urban life and facing Coronavirus (COVID- 19)

Background and objective: With the rise of urbanization and economic-trade, political, social, and cultural exchanges between cities around the world, the prevalence of epidemics has increased. Challenges caused by the most important factor that can affect the level of independence, authority, and sovereignty of cities and by becoming critical, have special effects on the strength and tolerance or resilience of cities (mainly their vulnerable people), can be from the perspective of the right approach to the city. The present study aims to analyze the relationship between the view of urban right to life for all citizens and the consequences of the crisis of Quaid 19 in cities. The main and fundamental question of this review is: What is the situation and situation of the people living in the cities in the face of the Corona crisis, with an emphasis on the theory and approach of the right to urban life? What strategies are more essential? Method: The research method of this study is fundamental and based on an "urban theory" which, while reviewing the sources, has presented strategies and strategies to reduce the negative effects of the phenomenon under study. Findings: This study examines the issue of the right to life for vulnerable urban people during the Corona Disease Period, based on the approach and concept of Henri Lefebvrechr('39')s "Right to the City" approach. A collective right that emphasizes democratic governance, national unity, and the interdependence of all recognized international civil, political, economic, social, cultural, and environmental rights. In addition to all the socio-economic implications of the new virus, Corona also clarified the logic of global politics and ethics, in the sense that a purely material reality and knowledge of moral and political systems are strongly interdependent, causing people to protect the rights of individuals also seeks the health of relatives and other residents of the city. In most countries, civil and urban organizations and institutions, various consultations and actions related to maintaining the level of empowerment and socio-economic power of the people of the cities have begun and achieved effective results. Conclusion: This study showed that the effects of this crisis on the living conditions and quality of urban people, in general, were very similar, but in particular, there are many differences between urban living conditions in the world, which depends on the conditions and level of social resilience. Economic and managerial cities. Emphasizing the view and importance of urban life rights, this study also considers strengthening the solidarity and local-national solidarity as the only fundamental solution to the disease and the resulting crisis. A path that leads to the health of the majority and not the economic benefit of a minority of people in society.