Conflict of Jurisprudential Rules and the Obligation of Self-Preservation with Ethical Standards in the Care and Management of Patients with Coronary Heart Disease

Common sense, according to rules such as no harm and no harm, the obligation to repel probable harm, the denial of embarrassment, the sanctity of induction in motion, the repulsion of harm from oneself is rationally and religiously obligatory, whether harmful or rationally possible; on the other hand in the teachings Islamic ethics embodies concepts such as self-sacrifice, compassion, cooperating, patience, benevolence, and the preservation of human dignity. The question that arises is whether physicians and caregivers are allowed to leave, according to the holy verse, "I should not leave until I die." Will their mission be to manage contagious diseases such as Corona virus infection? The present study, which has been organized by analytical and descriptive methods in order to combine the ethical principles of caring for infectious patients on the one hand and the rules related to protecting one's life from stagnation and eliminating self-harm, does not reflect the patient leaving in these conditions. Considers it against human dignity; therefore, it is appropriate for physicians and nurses, apart from their job duties, while strengthening the spirit of self-sacrifice and compassion in themselves, based on the rules of the medical system and the ethical principles governing the rules of jurisprudence, with strict and complete observance of health instructions. The rule of "Al-Misr Lightrak Bal-Masour" while protecting their health to care for and treat patients with coronary heart disease.