نام پژوهشگر: منیر گنجعلیخانی حاکمی

on the equivalence of constructed-response and multiple-choice : stem-equivalent, stem non-equivalent but content equivalent, and stem and content non-equivalent items in reading comprehension using multifaceted rasch
thesis وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری - دانشگاه ولی عصر (عج) - رفسنجان - دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی 1393
  منیر گنجعلیخانی حاکمی   حمدالله راوند

the present study investigated construct equivalence of multiple choice (mc) and constructed response (cr) item types across stem and content equivalent mc and cr items (item type ‘a’), non-stem-equivalent but content equivalent mc and cr items (item type ‘b’), and non-stem and non-content equivalent mc and cr items (item type ‘c’). one hundred seventy english-major undergraduates completed mc and cr forms of a reading comprehension test. the effect of different item formats on test takers’ performance was measured using multifaceted rasch measurement. the conclusion was that cognitive demands of mc items were higher than cr items. the findings of this study showed important pedagogical implications for test constructors as to the fact that the testing method can make a difference in tests of reading comprehension.