Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes – Early Dialogue, Broad Focus and Relevance: A Response to Recent Commentaries

Authors

Evelinn Mikkelsen Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Gert Jan van der Wilt Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Jan Hontelez Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands | Institute of Public Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany | Africa Health Research Institute, Mtubatuba, South Africa

Leon Bijlmakers Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Maarten P. Jansen Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Noor Tromp KIT (Royal Tropical Institute), Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Rob Baltussen Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Abstract:

This article doesn't have abstract

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Already have an account?login

similar resources

Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes – Learning by Doing; Comment on “Use of Evidence-informed Deliberative Processes by Health Technology Assessment Agencies Around the Globe”

The article by Oortwijn, Jansen, and Baltussen (OJB) is much more important than it appears because, in the absence of any good general theory of “evidence-informed deliberative processes” (EDP) and limited evidence of how they might be shaped and work in institutionalising health technology assessment (HTA), the best approach seems to be to accumulate the experience of...

full text