Combination of different clinical reasoning tests in a national exam
Authors
Abstract:
Introduction: Clinical reasoning as a critical and high level of clinicalcompetency should be acquired during medical education, and medicaleducators should attempt to assess this ability in medical students. Nowadays,there are several ways to evaluate medical students’ clinical reasoningability in different countries worldwide. There are some well-known clinicalreasoning tests such as Key Feature (KF), Clinical Reasoning Problem(CRP), Script Concordance Test (SCT), and Comprehensive IntegrativePuzzle (CIP). Each of these tests has its advantages and disadvantages. In thisstudy, we evaluated the reliability of combination of clinical reasoning testsSCT, KF, CIP, and CRP in one national exam and the correlation between thesubtest scores of these tests together with the total score of the exam.Methods: A total of 339 high ranked medical students from 60 medicalschools in Iran participated in a national exam named “Medical Olympiad”.The ninth Medical Olympiad was held in Shahid Beheshti University ofMedical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, under the direct supervision of the Ministryof Health and Medical Education in summer 2017. The expert groupdesigned a combination of four types of clinical reasoning tests to assessboth analytical and non-analytical clinical reasoning. Mean scores of SCT,CRP, KF, and CIP were measured using descriptive statistics. Reliabilitywas calculated for each test and the combination of tests using Cronbach’salpha. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the correlationbetween the score of each subtest and the total score. SPSS version 21 wasused for data analysis and the level of significance was considered <0.05.Results: The reliability of the combination of tests was 0.815. The reliability ofKF was 0.81 and 0.76, 0.80, and 0.92 for SCT, CRP, and CIP, respectively. Themean total score was 169.921±41.54 from 240. All correlations between eachclinical reasoning test and total score were significant (P<0.001). The highestcorrelation (0.887) was seen between CIP score and total score.Conclusion: The study showed that combining different clinical reasoningtests can be a reliable way of measuring this ability.
similar resources
The Effect of Bayesian Reasoning Training on the Results of Clinical Reasoning Tests of Interns
Introduction: Clinical reasoning includes a range of thinking about clinical medicine at all stages of patient evaluation. Bayesian theory can be used to refute or confirm differential diagnoses in the clinical reasoning process. In this way, by learning the basic mathematical language of probability in medicine, we can change our beliefs according to new evidence. The aim of this study is to i...
full textthe washback effect of discretepoint vs. integrative tests on the retention of content in knowledge tests
در این پایان نامه تاثیر دو نوع تست جزیی نگر و کلی نگر بر به یادسپاری محتوا ارزیابی شده که نتایج نشان دهندهکارایی تستهای کلی نگر بیشتر از سایر آزمونها است
15 صفحه اولmesuring the staff technology readiness, the case of a multi national chemical company operating in iran
چکیده ندارد.
15 صفحه اولFactors affecting clinical reasoning of occupational therapists: a qualitative study
Background: Clinical reasoning is generally defined as the numerous modes of thinking that guide clinical practice but little is known about the factors affecting how occupational therapists manage the decision-making process. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore the factors influencing the clinical reasoning of occupational therapists. Methods: Twelve occupational therapy pr...
full textOccupational Therapists\' Clinical Reasoning: A Qualitative Study
Objectives: Clinical reasoning is at the heart of clinical work; it is affected by different field factors. A clear understanding of the reasoning process could solve practitioners' problems on how to make their underlying theories, assumptions and values more explicit. The aim of this research is to understand how clinical reasoning process is formed in the context of occupational therapists w...
full textMy Resources
Journal title
volume 7 issue 4
pages 229- 233
publication date 2019-10-01
By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.
Keywords
Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com
copyright © 2015-2023