A tool for multi-stakeholder participation

نویسنده

  • S Panebianco
چکیده

Decisions regarding water management issues are by nature complex; they involve balancing the three interconnected pillars of sustainability: social welfare, economic needs and the needs of an ever-changing environment. Moreover, such decisions may include controversial or poorly understood issues, such as the role of equity or property rights, as well as conflicts of interest. Due to the uncertainty about the facts of the matter or simply due to differences in goals, different stakeholders (people or interest groups that are directly affected by or affecting a management problem) will often have quite different perspectives on what should be done. Only by taking into account these different perspectives and trying to balance the needs of society, environment and economics, can a manager reach any type of sustainable decision: one that will be generally acceptable and beneficial to all sectors. Sharing perspectives, i.e. finding a group consensus on weights and scores before entering them into the model is an ambitious goal but sometimes not feasible in conflicting situations. We need tools able to incorporate inputs from different people in order to compare and aggregate different perspectives. Thus, we aim to support stakeholders in making just such a complex decision. We can start off the process by stating that the goals of such a tool include • solutions to problems of resources use. • solutions that are generally acceptable (for which there is a consensus amongst participants, • solutions that can be financed • solutions that are relevant worldwide and thus adaptable to other regions • solutions that can be carried out within timelines appropriate to the length of a project • sustainable solutions. We suggest a methodological approach supported by the software tool called, AquaDT, that facilitates the process of decision making when adaptive, participatory and multi-level management arrangements have been or are likely to be critical to success.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Investigating the Formation of Stakeholder Participation in the General Policy Agenda of the Energy Commission of the Islamic Consultative Assembly

This study aims to fill the gap between the theory and practice of formulating a public policy agenda in the Energy Commission of the Parliament and its purpose is to provide conditions for activating participatory and innovative capacities to improve the public policy of the Parliament. The aim is to create a common understanding of the issues on the agenda and to strengthen the ability of sta...

متن کامل

Investigating the Formation of Stakeholder Participation in the General Policy Agenda of the Energy Commission of the Islamic Consultative Assembly

This study aims to fill the gap between the theory and practice of formulating a public policy agenda in the Energy Commission of the Parliament and its purpose is to provide conditions for activating participatory and innovative capacities to improve the public policy of the Parliament. The aim is to create a common understanding of the issues on the agenda and to strengthen the ability of sta...

متن کامل

Civil society engagement in multi-stakeholder dialogue: a qualitative study exploring the opinions and perceptions of MeTA members

BACKGROUND The Medicines Transparency Alliance (MeTA) is an initiative that brings together all stakeholders in the medicines market to create a multi-stakeholder dialogue and improve access, availability and affordability of medicines. Key to this multi-stakeholder dialogue is the participation of Civil Society Organisations. A recent MeTA annual review, identified uneven engagement of civil s...

متن کامل

Understanding the dynamics in e-Participation initiatives: Looking through the genre and stakeholder lenses

Conventionally, e-Participation initiatives are considered to be successful only if users use these services. While the growing body of e-Participation literature has listed and studied challenges and barriers to achieving this end, conceptual clarity on why such projects are considered as failures is yet to be achieved. We argue that this is due to the inadequate understanding of the complex s...

متن کامل

Stakeholder Participation for Legitimate Priority Setting: A Checklist

Accountable decision-makers are required to legitimize their priority setting decisions in health to members of society. In this perspective we stress the point that fair, legitimate processes should reflect efforts of authorities to treat all stakeholders as moral equals in terms of providing all people with well-justified, reasonable reasons to endorse the decisions. ...

متن کامل

Participation and Sustainable Management of Coastal Lagoon Ecosystems: The Case of the Fosu Lagoon in Ghana

Participation as a tool has been applied as a social learning process and communication platform to create awareness among stakeholders in the context of resource utilisation. The application of participatory processes to aquatic ecosystem management is attracting a growing body of literature. However, the application of participation as a tool for sustainable management of coastal lagoon ecosy...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007