Birdsong performance studies: a contrary view

Please cite this article in press as: Kroodsm 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.06.015 Birdsong biologists interested in sexual selection and honest signalling have repeatedly reported confirmation, over more than a decade, of the biological significance of a scatterplot between trill rate and frequency bandwidth. This ‘performance hypothesis’ proposes that the closer a song plots to an upper bound on the graph, the more difficult the song is to sing, and the more difficult the song the higher quality the singer, so that song quality honestly reveals male quality. In reviewing the confirming literature, however, I can find no support for this performance hypothesis. I will argue here that the scatter in the graph for songbirds is better explained by social factors and song learning. When songbirds learn their songs from each other, multiple males in a neighbourhood will sing the same song type. The need to conform to the local dialect of song types guides a male to learn a typical example of each song type for that population, not to take a memorized song and diminish or exaggerate it in trill rate or frequency bandwidth to honestly demonstrate his relative prowess. When data in this scatterplot are coded both by song type and by male, it is the song type and the need to conform that explains the variability, not the quality of different males. There is no consistent, reliable information in the song performance measures that can be used to evaluate a singing male. © 2016 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.