Private Enforcement of Commission Commitment Decisions: A Steep Climb not a Gentle Stroll
نویسندگان
چکیده
This Article examines the validity of the Commission’s position on the private enforceability of commitment decisions in national courts in the European Union in light of the current state of European law and other important procedural and practical considerations for third parties wishing to bring enforcement proceedings. As will become apparent, national courts faced with an application for private enforcement will have to grapple with a series of challenging legal issues concerning the nature of commitment decisions. The first of these questions will concern whether a commitment decision, which is a Community measure, will be capable of enforcement by application of the concept of direct effect of Community law. Our examination of the principles of direct effect indicates, however, that reliance on this concept may cause difficulties for national courts. Secondly, the principle of national procedural autonomy requires that enforcement proceedings will be governed by the procedural rules of the national court seized of the action. Even if commitment decisions are directly effective, there may consequently be substantial impediments to their effective private enforcement due to the national rules of procedure in the Member States.
منابع مشابه
Protection of Business and Production of Private Sector in Enforcement Proceedings
Forced enforcement of judicial decisions such as seizure causes difficulties in the production cycle. There are no restrictions on the seizure in the enforcement of sentences against production centers, including legal entities, and the determination of the type of property for seizure is belonged to winner and in contrast to the real persons, the rule of "immunity" is not identified for them. ...
متن کاملCommitments or Prohibition? the Eu Antitrust Dilemma
The European Commission relies increasingly on commitment decisions. More transparency on the substance of allegations, and the establishment of a higher number of legal precedents, are however necessary. This applies in particular to cases that tackle antitrust issues in new areas, such as markets for digital goods, in which companies might find it difficult to assess if a certain behaviour co...
متن کاملWorst Decision of the EU Court of Justice: The Alrosa Judgment in Context and the Future of Commitment Decisions
This Article details the evolution of the commitment decisions, analyzes the logic and the consequences of the Alrosa Court judgment, and offers some suggestions on how to establish a better equilibrium between the legitimate objective of promoting the effectiveness of the Commission by allowing it enough flexibility to end cases when competition could be restored rapidly and without major expe...
متن کاملThe State’s Enforcement Monopoly and the Private Protection of Property
The modern state has monopolized the legitimate use of force. This concept is twofold. First, the state is empowered with enforcement rights; second, the rights of the individuals are (partly) restricted. In a simple model of property rights with appropriation and defense activity, we show that a restriction of private enforcement is beneficial for the property owner, even if there are no econo...
متن کاملAre State Consumer Protection Acts Really Little-ftc Acts?
State Consumer Protection Acts (CPAs) were designed to supplement the Federal Trade Commission’s mission of protecting consumers and are often referred to as “little-FTC Acts.” There is growing concern that enforcement under these acts is not only qualitatively different than FTC enforcement, but may be counterproductive for consumers. This article examines a sample of CPA claims and compares t...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013