The Method of Reflective Equilibrium and the Deontology/Consequentialism Debate
نویسنده
چکیده
In this project, I seek to an answer to the question of whether the correct ethical framework is a deontological or consequentialist one. I begin with the assumption that morality is objective. Using that as a starting point, I discuss the two primary sources of data on moral topics: our intuitions and our judgments. I note some epistemic worries with regards to our moral intuitions, and argue that the process of arriving at judgments—rationality—constitutes a reliable process. Then, I argue for a method of doing ethics known as “reflective equilibrium,” which I modify in light of some concerns about the reliability of our intuitions and judgments. Next, I apply the method of reflective equilibrium to the deontology/consequentialism debate, and conclude that consequentialism is the correct ethical framework. I. ON THE RELEVANCY OF OUR MORAL INTUITIONS Before proceeding, I would like to make an important distinction between the notion of an intuition and that of a judgment. By ‘intuition’ I am referring to the initial compulsions we have regarding possible answers to various questions that are in some sense prior to argument and reasoning. For instance, consider the following scenario, presented by Peter Singer in his article “Ethics and Intuitions.” Mark and Julie are brother and sister and on a summer vacation in France. One night, they decide that it would be interesting to try and make love. They use two forms of birth control, they both enjoy the sex and think that it has brought them closer together, but they decide never to tell anyone about it and also never do it again. The reaction of disgust that is typically engendered by this scenario captures what I am referring to by ‘moral intuition.’ The average person, confronted with this scenario, would immediately react by condemning the actions of Mark and Julie as wrong; indeed, I did so myself when I first read it. Our intuitions are somewhat akin to our gut reactions to claims or thought
منابع مشابه
Deontology * David A. Mcnaughton and J. Piers Rawling
Which actions does morality require of us? What does it forbid and what does it permit? In trying to fi nd some general answers to these questions, moral theorists typically start from commonsense morality, from what ordinary people think about moral issues. In deciding how to act, people often think about the consequences of their actions: they try to fi nd the action that leads to the best ov...
متن کاملDoes Neuroscience Undermine Deontological Moral Theory?
Joshua Greene has argued that several lines of empirical research, including his own fMRI studies of brain activity during moral decisionmaking, comprise strong evidence against the legitimacy of deontology as a moral theory. This is because, Greene maintains, the empirical studies establish that “typically deontological” moral thinking is driven by prepotent emotional reactions which are not a...
متن کاملUtilitarian Ethics in Healthcare
There are two moral ethical dichotomies in healthcare: consequentialism versus deontology and individualism versus collectivism. When the physician is faced with the dilemma of deciding between one versus many, he often has to resort to the principle of promoting the greatest good for the greatest number, or the principle of maximizing utility. Utilitarianianism is the creed which accepts as th...
متن کاملPhilosophy and Ethical Consumption
Introduction This chapter introduces some basic philosophical approaches that are useful in understanding and evaluating ethical consumption issues and ethical consumer behaviour. The chapter is divided into three sections. The first section introduces the two main approaches to ethics in moral philosophy, ‘consequentialism’ and ‘deontology’, and considers how appropriate they are when applied ...
متن کاملModels of morality
Moral dilemmas engender conflicts between two traditions: consequentialism, which evaluates actions based on their outcomes, and deontology, which evaluates actions themselves. These strikingly resemble two distinct decision-making architectures: a model-based system that selects actions based on inferences about their consequences; and a model-free system that selects actions based on their re...
متن کامل