Bid Shading and Bidder Surplus in the U.S. Treasury Auction System

نویسندگان

  • Ali Hortaçsu
  • Jakub Kastl
  • Allen Zhang
چکیده

We analyze detailed bidding data from auctions of Treasury bills and notes conducted between July 2009 and October 2013. The U.S. Treasury uses a uniform price auction system, which we model building on the share auction model of Wilson (1979) and Kastl (2012). Our model takes into account informational asymmetries introduced by the primary dealership and indirect bidding system employed by the U.S. Treasury. Building on the methods developed by Hortaçsu (2002), Hortaçsu and McAdams (2010), Kastl (2011), and Hortaçsu and Kastl (2012), we estimate the amount of bid shading undertaken by the bidders under the assumption of bidder optimization. Our method also enables to us to estimate the marginal valuations of bidders that rationalize the observed bids under a private value framework. We find that primary dealers consistently bid higher yields in the auctions compared to direct and indirect bidders. Our model allows us to decompose this difference into two components: difference in demand/willingness-to-pay, and difference in ability to shade bids. We find that while primary dealer willingness-to-pay is similar to or even higher than direct and indirect bidders’, their ability to bid-shade is higher, leading to higher yield bids. By computing the area under bidders’ demand curves, we can also quantify the surplus that bidders derive from the auctions. We find that total bidder surplus across the sample period was, on average, 2.3 basis points. By comparing the actual allocation to the one corresponding to the maximum surplus, we also quantify the efficiency loss from the auctions, which was, on average, 2.25 basis points.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A Multi-attribute Reverse Auction Framework Under Uncertainty to the Procurement of Relief Items

One of the main activities of humanitarian logistics is to provide relief items for survivors in case of a disaster. To facilitate the procurement operation, this paper proposes a bidding framework for supplier selection and optimal allocation of relief items. The proposed auction process is divided into the announcement construction, bid construction and bid evaluation phases. In the announcem...

متن کامل

Competition in Treasury Auctions

We investigate the role of competition on the outcome of Austrian Treasury auctions. EU accession by Austria provides a ``natural experiment'' causing an exogenous increase in the number of bidders in Treasury Auctions. We use structural estimates of bidders' private values to examine the effect of increased competition on auction revenue and compare bidder surplus before and after the auction....

متن کامل

Pricing Rule in a Clock Auction

W analyze a discrete clock auction with lowest-accepted-bid (LAB) pricing and provisional winners, as adopted by India for its 3G spectrum auction. In a perfect Bayesian equilibrium, the provisional winner shades her bid, whereas provisional losers do not. Such differential shading leads to inefficiency. An auction with highest-rejected-bid (HRB) pricing and exit bids is strategically simple, h...

متن کامل

Treasury Auction Yields During Boom , Bust , and Quantitative Easing : Role for Fed and Foreign Purchasers

Since 2007, three actors have been particularly important in U.S. Treasury auctions: The U.S. government, issuing $8.4 trillion in U.S. Treasury securities in 2010 alone; foreign official entities, purchasing $398 billion in U.S. Treasury securities in 2010 alone; and finally the Federal Reserve, which intervened in the U.S. Treasury market by purchasing $900 billion U.S. Treasury securities du...

متن کامل

Fear of Losing in Dynamic Auctions: An Experimental Study

We analyze the implications of different pricing rules in discrete clock auctions. The two most common pricing rules are highest-rejected bid (HRB) and lowest-accepted bid (LAB). Under HRB, the winners pay the lowest price that clears the market; under LAB, the winners pay the highest price that clears the market. This pricing difference creates stronger incentives for bid shading under LAB. Wh...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014