Posterior Vitreous Detachment (PVD) Creation Leading to Intraoperative Retinal Detachment during Surgery for Idiopathic Macular Hole

Purpose: To report case of a patient who developed intraoperative supero-nasal retinal detachment during surgery for idiopathic macular hole. Methods: Interventional Case report of a 62-year-old male who presented with macular hole in both eyes and underwent surgery for macular hole closure in RE. Results: On presentation, visual acuity was 20/60 in RE and 20/200 in LE. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) examination revealed an old long standing stage IV macular hole in LE & a recent onset stage III macular hole in RE. In RE, pars planavitrectomy was undertaken. During the process of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) creation, a localized area of retina appeared white and oedematoussupero-nasally, at 3o’clock. When hyaloid was pulled in this region, it led to the creation of intraoperative retinal detachment. Brilliant blue green dye was then injected to stain and peel the internal limiting membrane (ILM) followed by fluid-air exchange and drainage of sub-retinal fluid from the break. Endolaser barrage was done around the break in 3-4 circular rows to oppose the retina with underlying choroid and to barrage the area of oedematous retina with detachment. C3F8: air (0.3:0.7) mixture was injected to provide internal tamponade followed by prone positioning post-operatively for ten days.4 weeks post-operatively, his visual acuity improved to 20/40 with complete reattachment of the retina and closure of macular hole. Conclusion: While surgery for macular hole is both, safe and effective, iatrogenic retinal breaks will always be a part of vitrectomy, despite progress in instrumentation and techniques. Central Bringing Excellence in Open Access   Nagpal et al. (2017) Email: JSM Ophthalmol 5(1): 1051 (2017) 2/4 the disc and gradually the macular area. After this the hyaloid detachment was extended to the periphery. In the supero-nasal area, suddenly there was a lot of resistance and a localized area of retina appeared oedematous. As we pulled the hyaloid in this area, we noted a RD coming up (Figure 3). Without using further vacuum, the adherent vitreous in that region was trimmed with the cutter. At this stage, peeling of the internal limiting membrane (ILM) was done after staining with brilliant blue green dye (Figure 4). Post ILM removal, fluid-air exchange was carried out followed by drainage of sub-retinal fluid from the break (Figure 5). Endolaser barrage was done around the break in 3-4 circular rows to oppose the retina with underlying choroid and to barrage the area of oedematous retina with detachment (Figure 6). C3F8: air (0.3:0.7) mixture was injected to provide internal tamponade. Patient was advised prone positioning for the next ten days. 4 weeks post-operatively, his visual acuity improved to 20/40 with complete reattachment of the retina and closure of macular hole evident on fundus and OCT examination (Figure 7a, 7b & 8). DISCUSSION PPV with ILM peeling and gas tamponade is the treatment modality for full thickness macular hole. As more of these surgeries are performed, various complications have been reported. Intraoperative iatrogenic retinal breaks and intraoperative/ post-operative RD are amongst the most common serious complications of macular hole surgery. Sjaarda et al., reported 10 (5.5%) iatrogenic retinal breaks and 2 (1.1%) postoperative RDs in 181 eyes with macular holes [6]. The incidence of retinal break varies considerably from 3 to 14% and of RD from 2 to 14% across the published reports [5,8,9]. With the advent of MIVS, the incidence is now probably at the lower end of this range. In 25-gauge vitrectomy, incidence of retinal breaks was reported to be 0% to 3.1% [10,11]. Retinal breaks occurring during macular hole surgery and resulting in RD are postulated to occur due to perpendicular tractional forces occurring on the vitreous base during Figure 1 Pre-operative OCT examination RE showing recent onset stage III full thickness macular hole. Figure 2 Pre-operative OCT examination LE showing old long standing stage IV full thickness macular hole. Figure 3 RE showing oedematous & white area of retina superonasally at 3o’clock position with formation of retinal detachment during removal of hyaloid after staining with IVTA. Figure 4 Peeling of the internal limiting membrane (ILM) after staining with brilliant blue green dye. Figure 5 Fluid-air exchange done post ILM removal. Central Bringing Excellence in Open Access   Nagpal et al. (2017) Email: JSM Ophthalmol 5(1): 1051 (2017) 3/4 Figure 6 Endolaser barrage around the break in 3-4 circular rows. Figure 7a 4 weeks post-operative color fundus photograph RE showing complete closure of macular hole. Figure 7b 4 weeks post-operative montage color fundus photograph RE showing complete closure of macular hole and retinal break with complete reattachment of retina at the site of retinal break. intraoperative creation and extension of a PVD. In a study comparing the incidence of iatrogenic retinal breaks with or without preoperative PVD in patients with macular hole, retinal breaks were detected in 12.7% with induction of PVD and in 3.1% without induction of PVD [8]. Further, the difference in the incidence of retinal break in various studies may be attributable to the surgical techniques used to initiate and advance PVD. Previous series have suggested that the majority of retinal breaks associated with macular hole surgery were located inferiorly [4,6,12]. A possible explanation may be that natural PVD usually starts superiorly and that inferior PVD is often incomplete. Also, the entry of cutter and light pipe may induce an a traumatic separation of the vitreous superiorly. This explains the predilection for inferior tears, as during surgery, PVD needs to be induced more often in the inferior region. A similar distribution of retinal break associated with macular hole surgery was found by Sjaarda et al [6]. However, some RDs do occur secondary to superior retinal breaks. A previous study noted that in 57 eyes with stage 4 macular hole, where intraoperative PVD induction was not required, superior tears were noted in 2, whereas none had inferior tears [6]. Hence, it has been postulated that, superior breaks, especially in the retinal quadrant near the sclerotomy of the surgeon’s dominant hand, are caused by traction at the sclerotomy site during the manipulation of instruments or due to vitreous incarceration [4]. In our case, after staining the posterior vitreous cortex with IVTA, the attached cortical vitreous was engaged with active suction by a cutter and PVD was extended to the peripheral retina. While separating the posterior vitreous cortex in the superonasal quadrant, a strong vitreo-retinal adherence was noted. Hyaloid in that region was extremely adherent and with every attempt to peel the hyaloid the retina seemed to get oedematous and white in colour and also started to lift up causing a localized retinal detachment. This is an unusual case of persistent vitreoretinal adherence in the superior region with formation of a superior break and RD during PVD induction. The break and the adjacent retina were cordoned off with endolaser photocoagulation. Long acting gas provided effective tamponade against the superior break as well as provided a surface for effectively bridging the full thickness macular hole. While surgery for macular hole is both, safe and effective, iatrogenic retinal breaks will always be a part of vitrectomy, despite progress in instrumentation and technique. Hence, surgeons must be cautious, especially during PVD induction as retinal breaks may accompany. A careful intraoperative examination and recognizing the characteristics of breaks remains the mainstay to limit the risk of potentially serious complications. Figure 8 4 weeks post-operatively OCT examination RE showing complete closure of macular hole with normal foveal contour. Central Bringing Excellence in Open Access   Nagpal et al. (2017) Email: JSM Ophthalmol 5(1): 1051 (2017)4/4Nagpal M, Juneja R, Chaudhary P (2017) Posterior Vitreous Detachment (PVD) Creation Leading to Intraoperative Retinal Detachment during Surgery for Idio-pathic Macular Hole. JSM Ophthalmol 5(1): 1051.Cite this articleREFERENCES 1. Lewis ML, Cohen SM, Smiddy WE, Gass JD. Bilaterality of idiopathicmacular holes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1996; 234: 241-245. 2. Tabandeh H, Chaudhry NA, Smiddy WE. Retinal detachment associatedwith macular hole surgery: characteristics, mechanism, and outcomes.Retina. 1999; 19: 281-286. 3. Kelly NE, Wendel RT. Vitreous surgery for idiopathic macular holes.Results of a pilot study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991; 109: 654-659. 4. Heier JS, Topping TM, Frederick AR Jr, Morley MG, Millay R, PesaventoRD. Visual and surgical outcomes of retinal detachment followingmacular hole repair. Retina. 1999; 19: 110-115. 5. Guillaubey A, Malvitte L, Lafontaine PO, Hubert I, Bron A, BerrodJP, et al. Incidence of retinal detachment after macular surgery: aretrospective study of 634 cases. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007; 91: 1327-1330. 6. Sjaarda RN, Glaser BM, Thompson JT, Murphy RP, Hanham A.Distribution of iatrogenic retinal breaks in macular hole surgery.Ophthalmology. 1995; 102: 1387-1392. 7. Dogramaci M, Lee EJ, Williamson TH. The incidence and the riskfactors for iatrogenic retinal breaks during pars plana vitrectomy. Eye(Lond). 2012; 26: 718-722. 8. Chung SE, Kim KH, Kang SW. Retinal breaks associated with theinduction of posterior vitreous detachment. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147: 1012–1016. 9. Park SS, Marcus DM, Duker JS, Pesavento RD, Topping TM, FrederickAR Jr, et al. Posterior segment complications after vitrectomy formacular hole. Ophthalmology. 1995; 102: 775-778. 10. Patelli F, Radice P, Zumbo G, Frisone G, Fasolino G. 25-gauge macularsurgery: results and complications. Retina. 2007; 27: 750-754. 11. Faia LJ, McCannel CA, Pulido JS, Hatfield RM, Hatfield ME, McNultyVEW. Outcomes following 25-gauge vitrectomies. Eye. 2008; 22:1024-1028. 12. Tan HS, Mura M, de Smet MD. Iatrogenic retinal breaks in 25-gaugemacular surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009; 148: 427-430.