Bias attenuation results for nondifferentially mismeasured ordinal and coarsened confounders.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Suppose we are interested in the effect of a binary treatment on an outcome where that relationship is confounded by an ordinal confounder. We assume that the true confounder is not observed, rather we observe a nondifferentially mismeasured version of it. We show that under certain monotonicity assumptions about its effect on the treatment and on the outcome, an effect measure controlling for the mismeasured confounder will fall between its corresponding crude and the true effect measures. We present results for coarsened, and, under further assumptions, for multiple misclassified confounders.
منابع مشابه
A method for sensitivity analysis to assess the effects of measurement error in multiple exposure variables using external validation data
BACKGROUND Measurement error in self-reported dietary intakes is known to bias the association between dietary intake and a health outcome of interest such as risk of a disease. The association can be distorted further by mismeasured confounders, leading to invalid results and conclusions. It is, however, difficult to adjust for the bias in the association when there is no internal validation d...
متن کاملتورش روش‌های آنالیز استاندارد در برآورد اثرات علیتی
Standard methods for estimating exposure effects in longitudinal studies will result in biased estimates of the exposure effect in the presence of time-dependent confounders affected by past exposure. In the present review article, we first described the assumptions required for estimating the causal effect in longitudinal studies and their structure regarding various types of exposure and ...
متن کاملOn the nondifferential misclassification of a binary confounder.
Consider a study with binary exposure, outcome, and confounder, where the confounder is nondifferentially misclassified. Epidemiologists have long accepted the unproven but oft-cited result that, if the confounder is binary, then odds ratios, risk ratios, and risk differences that control for the mismeasured confounder will lie between the crude and the true measures. In this paper, we provide ...
متن کاملComparison of Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Bayesian with Generalized Gibbs Sampling for Ordinal Regression Analysis of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
Background and Objectives: Analysis of ordinal data outcomes could lead to bias estimates and large variance in sparse one. The objective of this study is to compare parameter estimates of an ordinal regression model under maximum likelihood and Bayesian framework with generalized Gibbs sampling. The models were used to analyze ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome data. Methods: This study use...
متن کاملNonlinear Models of Measurement Errors
Measure errors in economic data are pervasive and nontrivial in size. The presence of measurement errors causes biased and inconsistent parameter estimates and leads to erroneous conclusions to various degrees in economic analysis. The importance of measurement errors in analyzing the empirical implications of economic theories is highlighted in Milton Friedman’s seminal book on the consumption...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Biometrika
دوره 100 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013