Knowledge of Social Affiliations Biases Economic Decisions
نویسندگان
چکیده
An individual's reputation and group membership can produce automatic judgments and behaviors toward that individual. Whether an individual's social reputation impacts interactions with affiliates has yet to be demonstrated. We tested the hypothesis that during initial encounters with others, existing knowledge of their social network guides behavior toward them. Participants learned reputations (cooperate, defect, or equal mix) for virtual players through an iterated economic game (EG). Then, participants learned one novel friend for each player. The critical question was how participants treated the friends in a single-shot EG after the friend-learning phase. Participants tended to cooperate with friends of cooperators and defect on friends of defectors, indicative of a decision making bias based on memory for social affiliations. Interestingly, participants' explicit predictions of the friends' future behavior showed no such bias. Moreover, the bias to defect on friends of defectors was enhanced when affiliations were learned in a social context; participants who learned to associate novel faces with player faces during reinforcement learning did not show reputation-based bias for associates of defectors during single-shot EG. These data indicate that when faced with risky social decisions, memories of social connections influence behavior implicitly.
منابع مشابه
The Effects of the CEO’s Perceptual Bias in Economic Decision-Making and Judgment on the Capabilities of the Financial Reporting Quality
The current research sets out to identify and scrutinize the impact of the CEO’s perceptual biases in judgment and economic decision-making on the reporting quality of the firms listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Adopting a mixed method, the present study first seeks to detect the components and indices of CEO’s perceptual biases via critical appraisal and with the special participation of 10...
متن کاملDecision-Making and Biases in Causal-Explanatory Reasoning
Decisions often rely on judgments about the probabilities of various explanations. Recent research has uncovered a host of biases that afflict explanatory inference: Would these biases also translate into decision-making? We find that although people show biased inferences when making explanatory judgments in decision-relevant contexts (Exp. 1A), these biases are attenuated or eliminated when t...
متن کاملThe effect of bio rhythmic states of traders on their perceptual decisions in Tehran Stock Exchange
The aim of this study is to find the effect of trader’s biorhythmic cycles on their perceptual decisions in Tehran Stock Exchange. According to author’s point of view, decision making is one of the major factors of management skills, and in some cases, it is equivalent of management (Simon’s point of view). Also considering this fact that the knowledge of psychological factors and it’s effects ...
متن کاملThe evolution of irrational decision-making: insights from non-human primates
Despite our species’ impressive cognitive sophistication, adult humans are nevertheless notoriously bad at making normatively rational economic decisions. Much work has examined the nature of biased decisions such as framing effects, the endowment effect, and the peak-end principle in adult humans; however, research examining the origins of these biases is still in its infancy. This paper exami...
متن کاملIvies, extracurriculars, and exclusion: Elite employersâ€TM use of educational credentials
Although a robust literature has demonstrated a positive relationship between education and socio-economic attainment, the processes through which formal schooling yields enhanced economic and social rewards remain less clear. Employers play a crucial role in explaining the returns to formal schooling yet little is known about how employers, particularly elite employers, use and interpret educa...
متن کامل