Imaging, Diagnosis, Prognosis Evaluation of Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Pretherapeutic Assessment and Staging of Lymphoma: Results of a Prospective Study in 140 Patients

Purpose: To determine the value of diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI-MRI) for pretherapeutic imaging of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid lymphoma and lymphoma with variable FDG avidity. Experimental Design: Treatment-na€ ve patients with lymphoma who were referred for whole-body staging were included in this prospective study. Group A included patients with FDG-avid lymphoma (e.g., Hodgkin, diffuse large B-cell, and follicular lymphoma), whereas Group B included patients with lymphoma of variable FDG avidity [e.g., extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT)]. All patients underwent DWI-MRI and 18F-FDGpositron emission tomography/ computed tomography (PET/CT). Region-based sensitivity and agreement with Ann Arbor staging, relative to the reference standard, were calculated for DWI-MRI, and, in Group B, also 18F-FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced (CE-) CT. Results: In Group A (100 patients), DWI-MRI had a region-based sensitivity of 97%, and with regard to staging, agreedwith the reference standard in 94 of 100 patients (k, 0.92). InGroup B (40 patients; 38MALT lymphomas and 2 small lymphocytic lymphomas/chronic lymphocytic leukemias), DWI-MRI, 18F-FDGPET/CT, andCE-CT had region-based sensitivities of 94.4%, 60.9%, and 70.7%, respectively.With regard to staging in Group B, DWI-MRI, 18F-FDG-PET/CT, and CE-CT agreed with the reference standard in 37 of 40, 26 of 40, and 24 of 40 patients, with k values of 0.89, 0.52, and 0.43, respectively. Conclusions: In patients with FDG-avid lymphoma, DWI-MRI seems to be only slightly inferior to 18FFDG-PET/CT with regard to pretherapeutic regional assessment and staging. In patients with lymphoma subtypes that show a variable FDG avidity (e.g., MALT lymphoma), DWI-MRI seems to be superior to both 18F-FDG-PET/CT and CE-CT. Clin Cancer Res; 20(11); 2984–93. 2014 AACR.