The Disability Dilemma: A Skeptical Bench & Bar
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Effects of the bench shirt on sagittal bar path.
Powerlifting, like many sports, uses specialized equipment to enhance performance and decrease the chance of injury. The purpose of this exploratory study was to determine whether wearing a bench press shirt would alter the natural mechanics of the bench press, causing a more efficient lift when pressing the same weight as without the bench shirt. Participants (n = 5) completed 2 series of 1-re...
متن کاملFatigue effects on bar kinematics during the bench press.
The bench press is one of the most popular weight training exercises. Although most training regimens incorporate multiple repetition sets, there are few data describing how the kinematics of a lift change during a set to failure. To examine these changes, recreational lifters (10 men and 8 women) were recruited. The maximum weight each subject could bench press (1RM) was determined. Subjects t...
متن کاملA skeptical biochemist
Social history, especially of bioethics, is bound to be problematic unless it is predicated upon a clear analysis of the substantive ethical issues. At issue in the 1960s was whether research standards should be subjective guidelines, enforced by the researcher's conscience, externally enforced objective rules, or intersubjective standards enforced by review committees (IRBs). In a series of pa...
متن کاملWhat Is a Skeptical Proof?
We investigate the task of skeptically reasoning in extensionbased, nonmonotonic logics by concentrating on general argumentation theories. The restricted applicability of Dung’s notion of skeptical provability in his well-known argumentation framework is illustrated, and a new approach based on the notion of a claim associated with each argument is proposed. We provide a formal definition of a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: University of Pittsburgh Law Review
سال: 2008
ISSN: 1942-8405,0041-9915
DOI: 10.5195/lawreview.2008.110