منابع مشابه
The XXth century dengue pandemic: need for surveillance and research.
By the last decade of the XXth century Aedes aegypti and the 4 dengue viruses had spread to nearly all countries of the tropical world. Some 2 billion persons live in dengue-endemic areas with tens of millions infected annually. Dengue pandemics were also documented in the XVIIIth and XIXth centuries; they were contained by organized anti-Aedes aegypti campaigns and urban improvements. The XXth...
متن کاملLead in petrol: the mistake of the XXth century.
The health aspects of the use of lead in petrol were evaluated in the 1920s in the United States of America and, in spite of warnings from certain lead-toxicity experts, lead addition to petrol became standard international practice. Available data now show that lead in petrol at the scale of use in the 1970s produced significant environmental lead contamination and increased average blood-lead...
متن کاملAppendix B: Seminar transcript POTATO VIRUSES AFTER THE XXth CENTURY: EFFECTS, DISSEMINATION AND THEIR CONTROL
Soon after its introduction to Europe prior to 1570, potato crops started to suffer “degeneration” or “running off”. This was attributed to physiological changes in the cultivars due to continuous vegetative propagation (Salaman, 1970). It was not until the XIXth century that the true cause of degeneration was found to be due to diseases, especially those caused by viruses. Thus, for successful...
متن کاملReading Brandom Reading Heidegger
While brilliance and originality surely top the list of qualities shared by Brandom and Heidegger, another commonality is a tendency to treat their predecessors as partial and sometimes confused versions of themselves. Heidegger, therefore, could hardly be indignant on principle if Brandom finds a fair bit of Making it Explicit in the first division of Being and Time. Nevertheless, some details...
متن کاملHeidegger on Science and Naturalism
Joseph Rouse Wesleyan University Heidegger’s reputation in the Anglophone philosophical world suggests that he was unsympathetic to the natural sciences, and generally unconcerned with the philosophy of science. Even among those who know his work, philosophy of science is not usually considered central to Heidegger, nor is he seen as a significant contributor to philosophy of science. This diss...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Enrahonar. Quaderns de filosofia
سال: 2002
ISSN: 2014-881X,0211-402X
DOI: 10.5565/rev/enrahonar.390